When an event occurs, verbatim memory records an accurate representation. But even as it is doing so, gist memory begins processing the information and determining how it fits into our existing storehouse of knowledge. Verbatim memories generally die away within a day or two, leaving only the gist memory, which records the event as we interpreted it.

Under certain circumstances, this can produce a phenomenon Reyna and her colleagues refer to as “phantom recollection.” She calls this “a powerful form of false alarm” in which gist memory — designed to look for patterns and fill in perceived gaps —creates a vivid but illusory image in our mind.

the study (via rach)

I think I have an overactive “gist-izer” I’m able to make predictions / fill in gaps accurately and quick, but I also have a vast store of memories of events that never occured.

  1. three50eight reblogged this from marco and added:
    I might paraphrase...conversations but atleast you get the gist
  2. 41247 reblogged this from marco
  3. yurztruly reblogged this from rach and added:
    Again, further support for...point I delineated below. Awesome
  4. silouan reblogged this from rach
  5. adeandabet reblogged this from lezbehonest
  6. lezbehonest reblogged this from rach
  7. fishy reblogged this from rach
  8. lovefromarianna reblogged this from rach
  9. faucet reblogged this from rach and added:
    quick, but I also have a vast store of memories of events
  10. julyshewillfly reblogged this from somethingchanged
  11. rachelhills reblogged this from somethingchanged
  12. rachelbdoyle reblogged this from rach and added:
    The above quote from a...I rarely if ever remember exactly what was said in emotionally...
  13. zetahydrae reblogged this from marco
  14. pica reblogged this from marco
  15. noahkai reblogged this from rach
  16. omghack reblogged this from marco
  17. thedirtydan reblogged this from marco
  18. marco reblogged this from rach
  19. brilliantlydisruptive reblogged this from rach
  20. rach posted this